- Title
- Value initialization and defaulted constructors (part 2)
- Status
- cd3
- Section
- 9.5 [dcl.init]
- Submitter
- Jason Merrill
Created on 2011-06-28.00:00:00 last changed 141 months ago
Messages
Date: 2012-02-15.00:00:00
[Voted into the WP at the February, 2012 meeting; moved to DR at the October, 2012 meeting.]
Date: 2011-08-15.00:00:00
Proposed resolution (August, 2011):
This issue is resolved by the resolution of issue 1301.
Date: 2012-11-03.00:00:00
According to the current rules of 9.5 [dcl.init], given a class like
struct A {
int i;
A() = default;
A(int i): i(i) { }
};
value-initialization leaves A::i uninitialized. This seems like an oversight.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drwp -> cd3 |
| 2012-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg4171 |
| 2012-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> drwp |
| 2012-02-27 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3817 |
| 2012-02-27 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
| 2011-06-28 00:00:00 | admin | create | |