Created on 2011-06-28.00:00:00 last changed 130 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the February, 2012 meeting; moved to DR at the October, 2012 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (August, 2011):
This issue is resolved by the resolution of issue 1301.
According to the current rules of 9.4 [dcl.init], given a class like
struct A { int i; A() = default; A(int i): i(i) { } };
value-initialization leaves A::i uninitialized. This seems like an oversight.
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drwp -> cd3 |
2012-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg4171 |
2012-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> drwp |
2012-02-27 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3817 |
2012-02-27 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
2011-06-28 00:00:00 | admin | create |