Created on 2011-04-18.00:00:00 last changed 130 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the February, 2012 meeting; moved to DR at the October, 2012 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (August, 2011):
Change 9.4 [dcl.init] paragraph 7 as follows:
To value-initialize an object of type T means:
if T is a (possibly cv-qualified) class type (Clause 11 [class]) with either no default constructor (11.4.5 [class.ctor]) or a default constructor that is user-provided or deleted
constructor (11.4.5 [class.ctor]), then the object is default-initializeddefault constructor for T is called (and the initialization is ill-formed if T has no accessible default constructor);if T is a (possibly cv-qualified) non-union class type without a user-provided or deleted default constructor, then the object is zero-initialized and, if
T's implicitly-declared default constructor isT has a non-trivial default constructor,that constructor is called.default-initialized;...
Change 9.4.5 [dcl.init.list] paragraph 3 as follows:
List-initialization of an object or reference of type T is defined as follows:
If the initializer list has no elements and T is a class type with a default constructor, the object is value-initialized.
Otherwise, ifIf T is an aggregate, aggregate initialization is performed (9.4.2 [dcl.init.aggr]). [Example:...Otherwise, if the initializer list has no elements and T is a class type with a default constructor, the object is value-initialized.
...
According to 9.4 [dcl.init] paragraph 7,
To value-initialize an object of type T means:
if T is a (possibly cv-qualified) class type (Clause 11 [class]) with a user-provided constructor (11.4.5 [class.ctor]), then the default constructor for T is called (and the initialization is ill-formed if T has no accessible default constructor);
if T is a (possibly cv-qualified) non-union class type without a user-provided constructor, then the object is zero-initialized and, if T's implicitly-declared default constructor is non-trivial, that constructor is called.
if T is an array type, then each element is value-initialized;
otherwise, the object is zero-initialized.
This suggests that for
struct A { A() = delete; }; union B { A a }; int main() { B(); }
a B temporary is created and zero-initialized, even though its default constructor is deleted. We should strike "non-union" and also the "if...non-trivial" condition, since we can have a trivial deleted constructor.
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drwp -> cd3 |
2012-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> drwp |
2012-09-24 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg4006 |
2012-02-27 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3815 |
2012-02-27 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
2011-04-18 00:00:00 | admin | create |