Proposed resolution:

This wording is relative to N4964.

1. Modify [atomics.syn], header <atomic> synopsis, as indicated:

   namespace std {
     // [atomics.order], order and consistency
     enum class memory_order : unspecified;                        // freestanding
     inline constexpr memory_order memory_order_relaxed = memory_order::relaxedusing memory_order::memory_order_relaxed; // freestanding
     inline constexpr memory_order memory_order_consume = memory_order::consumeusing memory_order::memory_order_consume; // freestanding
     inline constexpr memory_order memory_order_acquire = memory_order::acquireusing memory_order::memory_order_acquire; // freestanding
     inline constexpr memory_order memory_order_release = memory_order::releaseusing memory_order::memory_order_release; // freestanding
     inline constexpr memory_order memory_order_acq_rel = memory_order::acq_relusing memory_order::memory_order_acq_rel; // freestanding
     inline constexpr memory_order memory_order_seq_cst = memory_order::seq_cstusing memory_order::memory_order_seq_cst; // freestanding
     
     […]
   }
   […]
   

2. Modify [atomics.order] as indicated:

   namespace std {
     enum class memory_order : unspecified {
       relaxed, consume, acquire, release, acq_rel, seq_cst,
       memory_order_relaxed = relaxed, memory_order_consume = consume, memory_order_acquire = acquire,
       memory_order_release = release, memory_order_acq_rel = acq_rel, memory_order_seq_cst = seq_cst
     };
   }

[ 2023-11-02; Reflector poll ]

Set priority to 4 after reflector poll.

P0439R0 made std::memory_order an scoped enumeration type. However, it also changed former enumerators (std::memory_order_seq_cst) to constexpr variables.

It is unclear the additional change is intended while it presumably bothered nobody in practice. Given there is using enum (P1099R5) in C++20, it may be better to keep these constants being prvalues.