Created on 2023-04-16.00:00:00 last changed 10 months ago
Proposed resolution:
This wording is relative to N4944.
Modify [format.formattable] as indicated:
-1- Let fmt-iter-for<charT> be an unspecified type that models output_iterator<const charT&> ([iterator.concept.output]).
[…] template<class T, class charT> concept formattable = formattable-with<remove_reference_t<T>, basic_format_context<fmt-iter-for<charT>, charT>>;
[ 2023-06-17 Approved at June 2023 meeting in Varna. Status changed: Voting → WP. ]
[ 2023-05-24; Reflector poll ]
Set status to Tentatively Ready after ten votes in favour during reflector poll.
LWG 3631 modified the formattable concept. The new wording contains a small issue: basic_format_context requires two template arguments, but only one is provided.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2023-06-19 14:50:03 | admin | set | messages: + msg13654 |
| 2023-06-19 14:50:03 | admin | set | status: voting -> wp |
| 2023-06-12 08:52:25 | admin | set | status: ready -> voting |
| 2023-05-24 14:31:37 | admin | set | messages: + msg13564 |
| 2023-05-24 14:31:37 | admin | set | status: new -> ready |
| 2023-04-16 16:19:02 | admin | set | messages: + msg13530 |
| 2023-04-16 00:00:00 | admin | create | |