Issue 2866 - WG21 LWG Issues
Title
Incorrect derived classes constraints
Status
c++17
Section
[derivation]
Submitter
Great Britain

Created on 2017-02-03.00:00:00 last changed 100 months ago

Messages

msg9066 (view)
Date: 2017-03-03.22:14:37

Proposed resolution:

This wording is relative to N4640.

  1. Modify [derivation] paragraph 3.2 as indicated:

    Every base class described as non-virtual shall not be virtual; Every base class not specified as virtual shall not be virtual;
msg8961 (view)
Date: 2017-03-03.22:14:37

[ Kona 2017-03-01 ]

Accepted as Immediate to resolve NB comment.
msg8848 (view)
Date: 2017-02-03.00:00:00

Addresses GB 36

For bullet (3.2), no base classes are described as non-virtual. Rather, base classes are not specified as virtual, a subtly different negative.

Proposed change:

Rewrite bullet 3.2:

Every base class not specified as virtual shall not be virtual;

History
Date User Action Args
2017-07-30 20:15:43adminsetstatus: wp -> c++17
2017-03-05 23:46:08adminsetstatus: immediate -> wp
2017-03-03 22:14:37adminsetmessages: + msg9066
2017-03-03 22:14:37adminsetstatus: new -> immediate
2017-02-20 22:01:30adminsetmessages: + msg8961
2017-02-03 00:00:00admincreate