Proposed resolution (June, 2014):
Change 5.5 [lex.pptoken] paragraph 4 as follows:
[Example: The program fragment1Ex0xe+foo is parsed as a preprocessing number token (one that is not a valid floating or integer literal token), even though a parse asthe pair ofthree preprocessing tokens10xe, +, andExfoo might produce a valid expression (for example, ifExfoo were a macro defined as+1). Similarly, the program fragment 1E1 is parsed as a preprocessing number (one that is a valid floating literal token), whether or not E is a macro name. —end example]
Delete 5.13.9 [lex.ext] paragraph 10:
Some identifiers appearing as ud-suffixes are reserved for future standardization (16.4.5.3.6 [usrlit.suffix]). A program containing such a ud-suffix is ill-formed, no diagnostic required.
Change 12.6 [over.literal] paragraph 1 as follows:
The string-literal or user-defined-string-literal in a literal-operator-id shall have no encoding-prefix and shall contain no characters other than the implicit terminating '\0'. The ud-suffix of the user-defined-string-literal or the identifier in a literal-operator-id is called a literal suffix identifier.[Note: someSome literal suffix identifiers are reserved for future standardization; see 16.4.5.3.6 [usrlit.suffix].—end note]A declaration whose literal-operator-id uses such a literal suffix identifier is ill-formed; no diagnostic required.
Change 16.4.5.3.6 [usrlit.suffix] paragraph 1 as follows:
Literal suffix identifiers (12.6 [over.literal]) that do not start with an underscore are reserved for future standardization.