Created on 2009-10-25.00:00:00 last changed 130 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the November, 2010 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (November, 2010):
See paper N3217.
Note (October, 2010):
Additional discussion has indicated a potential willingness to revisit this question.
Rationale (August, 2010):
This was previously considered and rejected by EWG.
It seems strange that it is possible to call a function with an explict argument of {} but that it is not possible to specify that same argument as a default in a function declaration.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: fdis -> c++11 |
| 2011-04-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> fdis |
| 2010-11-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3173 |
| 2010-11-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3172 |
| 2010-11-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> dr |
| 2010-10-18 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3029 |
| 2010-10-18 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: nad -> open |
| 2010-08-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2946 |
| 2010-08-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> nad |
| 2009-10-25 00:00:00 | admin | create | |