Title
Use of decltype as a class-name
Status
cd2
Section
9.2.9.3 [dcl.type.simple]
Submitter
Alisdair Meredith

Created on 2009-08-03.00:00:00 last changed 144 months ago

Messages

Date: 2010-03-15.00:00:00

[Voted into WP at March, 2010 meeting as document N3049.]

Date: 2010-02-15.00:00:00

Proposed resolution (February, 2010):

See paper PL22.16/10-0021 = WG21 N3031.

Date: 2009-08-03.00:00:00

In the current specification, a decltype resulting in a class type is not a class-name, meaning that it cannot be used as a base-specifier. There doesn't seem to be any reason not to allow that, and it would be consistent with the proposed outcome of issue 743.

History
Date User Action Args
2010-03-29 00:00:00adminsetmessages: + msg2686
2010-03-29 00:00:00adminsetstatus: review -> cd2
2010-02-16 00:00:00adminsetmessages: + msg2536
2010-02-16 00:00:00adminsetstatus: drafting -> review
2009-11-08 00:00:00adminsetstatus: open -> drafting
2009-08-03 00:00:00admincreate