Created on 2009-08-03.00:00:00 last changed 171 months ago
[Voted into WP at March, 2010 meeting as document N3049.]
Proposed resolution (February, 2010):
See paper PL22.16/10-0021 = WG21 N3031.
In the current specification, a decltype resulting in a class type is not a class-name, meaning that it cannot be used as a base-specifier. There doesn't seem to be any reason not to allow that, and it would be consistent with the proposed outcome of issue 743.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-03-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2686 |
| 2010-03-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: review -> cd2 |
| 2010-02-16 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2536 |
| 2010-02-16 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> review |
| 2009-11-08 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> drafting |
| 2009-08-03 00:00:00 | admin | create | |