Created on 2009-06-12.00:00:00 last changed 159 months ago
[Voted into WP at March, 2010 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (October, 2009):
This issue is resolved by the resolution of issue 845.
Notes from the July, 2009 meeting:
The intent is that this usage should be supported.
It is not clear whether the following definition of an explicit specialization of a member function template is permitted or not:
template <typenanme T> struct S {
template <typename U> void f();
};
template <> template <typename U>
void S<int>::f() = delete;
Is the explicit specialization the “first declaration” of the member function template?
(See also issue 845.)
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2012-09-24 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg4018 |
| 2012-09-24 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg4017 |
| 2012-09-24 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> cd2 |
| 2009-08-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2197 |
| 2009-08-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> drafting |
| 2009-06-12 00:00:00 | admin | create | |