Created on 1998-12-15.00:00:00 last changed 162 months ago
Proposed resolution (10/00): In 9.4 [dcl.init] paragraph 9, replace
Otherwise, if no initializer is specified for an object..."with
Otherwise, if no initializer is specified for a object...
Paragraph 9 of 9.4 [dcl.init] says:
If no initializer is specified for an object, and the object is of (possibly cv-qualified) non-POD class type (or array thereof), the object shall be default-initialized; if the object is of const-qualified type, the underlying class type shall have a user-declared default constructor. Otherwise, if no initializer is specified for an object, the object and its subobjects, if any, have an indeterminate initial value; if the object or any of its subobjects are of const-qualified type, the program is ill-formed.It should be made clear that this paragraph does not apply to static objects.
|2008-10-05 00:00:00||admin||set||status: wp -> cd1|
|2007-01-14 00:00:00||admin||set||status: tc1 -> wp|
|2003-04-25 00:00:00||admin||set||status: dr -> tc1|
|2000-11-18 00:00:00||admin||set||status: ready -> dr|
|2000-05-21 00:00:00||admin||set||status: review -> ready|
|2000-02-23 00:00:00||admin||set||messages: + msg224|
|2000-02-23 00:00:00||admin||set||status: open -> review|