Created on 1998-12-15.00:00:00 last changed 189 months ago
Proposed resolution (10/00): In 9.4 [dcl.init] paragraph 9, replace
Otherwise, if no initializer is specified for an object..."with
Otherwise, if no initializer is specified for a non-static object...
Paragraph 9 of 9.4 [dcl.init] says:
If no initializer is specified for an object, and the object is of (possibly cv-qualified) non-POD class type (or array thereof), the object shall be default-initialized; if the object is of const-qualified type, the underlying class type shall have a user-declared default constructor. Otherwise, if no initializer is specified for an object, the object and its subobjects, if any, have an indeterminate initial value; if the object or any of its subobjects are of const-qualified type, the program is ill-formed.It should be made clear that this paragraph does not apply to static objects.
Proposed resolution (10/00): In 9.4 [dcl.init] paragraph 9, replace
Otherwise, if no initializer is specified for an object..."with
Otherwise, if no initializer is specified for a non-static object...
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-10-05 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: wp -> cd1 |
| 2007-01-14 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: tc1 -> wp |
| 2003-04-25 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> tc1 |
| 2000-11-18 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
| 2000-05-21 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: review -> ready |
| 2000-02-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg224 |
| 2000-02-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> review |
| 1998-12-15 00:00:00 | admin | create | |