- Title
- Can a closure class be a POD?
- Status
- cd2
- Section
- 7.5.6.2 [expr.prim.lambda.closure]
- Submitter
- John Spicer
Created on 2009-02-11.00:00:00 last changed 190 months ago
Messages
Date: 2009-07-15.00:00:00
[Voted into the WP at the July, 2009 meeting as part of N2927.]
Date: 2009-07-15.00:00:00
Proposed resolution (July, 2009)
See document PL22.16/09-0117 = WG21 N2927.
Date: 2009-03-15.00:00:00
Notes from the March, 2009 meeting:
A closure class is neither standard-layout nor trivial.
Date: 2009-02-11.00:00:00
The current wording does not state under what conditions, if ever, a closure class is a POD. It should either be explicitly unspecified or definitively stated that a closure class is never a POD, to allow implementations freedom to determine the contents of closure classes.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-03-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: wp -> cd2 |
| 2009-11-08 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> wp |
| 2009-08-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2248 |
| 2009-08-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: review -> dr |
| 2009-03-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg1919 |
| 2009-03-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg1918 |
| 2009-02-11 00:00:00 | admin | create | |