Created on 2009-02-11.00:00:00 last changed 144 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the July, 2009 meeting as part of N2927.]
Proposed resolution (July, 2009)
See document PL22.16/09-0117 = WG21 N2927.
Notes from the March, 2009 meeting:
A closure class is neither standard-layout nor trivial.
The current wording does not state under what conditions, if ever, a closure class is a POD. It should either be explicitly unspecified or definitively stated that a closure class is never a POD, to allow implementations freedom to determine the contents of closure classes.
|2010-03-29 00:00:00||admin||set||status: wp -> cd2|
|2009-11-08 00:00:00||admin||set||status: dr -> wp|
|2009-08-03 00:00:00||admin||set||messages: + msg2248|
|2009-08-03 00:00:00||admin||set||status: review -> dr|
|2009-03-23 00:00:00||admin||set||messages: + msg1919|
|2009-03-23 00:00:00||admin||set||messages: + msg1918|