Created on 2009-02-09.00:00:00 last changed 171 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the July, 2009 meeting as part of N2927.]
Proposed resolution (June, 2009):
See document PL22.16/09-0117 = WG21 N2927.
It is currently unspecified whether a declaration like
f() -> struct S { };
should be parsed as a declaration of f whose return type is a class definition (which will be ill-formed according to 9.2.9 [dcl.type] paragraph 3) or as a definition of f whose return type is an elaborated-type-specifier.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-03-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: wp -> cd2 |
| 2009-11-08 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> wp |
| 2009-08-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2259 |
| 2009-08-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: review -> dr |
| 2009-06-19 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2040 |
| 2009-06-19 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> review |
| 2009-02-09 00:00:00 | admin | create | |