- Title
- Inferred return type of closure object call operator
- Status
- cd2
- Section
- 7.5.6.2 [expr.prim.lambda.closure]
- Submitter
- Daveed Vandevoorde
Created on 2009-02-05.00:00:00 last changed 189 months ago
Messages
Date: 2009-07-15.00:00:00
[Voted into the WP at the July, 2009 meeting as part of N2927.]
Date: 2009-07-15.00:00:00
Proposed resolution (July, 2009)
See document PL22.16/09-0117 = WG21 N2927.
Date: 2009-02-05.00:00:00
According to 7.5.6 [expr.prim.lambda] paragraph 10, the following lambda expressions are ill-formed because the return types of the generated operator() functions are an array type and a function type, respectively:
void f() {
[]{ return ""; };
[]{ return f; };
}
It would seem reasonable to expect the array-to-pointer and function-to-pointer decay to apply to these return values and hence to the inferred return type of operator().
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-03-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: wp -> cd2 |
| 2009-11-08 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> wp |
| 2009-08-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2238 |
| 2009-08-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: review -> dr |
| 2009-03-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg1902 |
| 2009-03-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> review |
| 2009-02-05 00:00:00 | admin | create | |