Created on 2008-08-23.00:00:00 last changed 96 months ago
[Voted into WP at August, 2010 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (February, 2010):
Change the third bullet of the note in 13.10.3 [temp.deduct] paragraph 8 as follows:
[Note: Type deduction may fail for the following reasons:
Attempting to use a type that is not a class type in a qualified name. [Example:...
The current rules in 13.10.3 [temp.deduct] say that type deduction fails as a result of attempting to use a type that is not a class type in a qualified name. However, it is now possible to use enumeration names as nested-name-specifiers, so this rule needs to be updated accordingly.
|2014-03-03 00:00:00||admin||set||status: fdis -> c++11|
|2011-04-10 00:00:00||admin||set||status: wp -> fdis|
|2010-11-29 00:00:00||admin||set||status: dr -> wp|
|2010-08-23 00:00:00||admin||set||messages: + msg2933|
|2010-08-23 00:00:00||admin||set||status: ready -> dr|
|2010-03-29 00:00:00||admin||set||status: review -> ready|
|2010-02-16 00:00:00||admin||set||messages: + msg2568|
|2010-02-16 00:00:00||admin||set||status: drafting -> review|
|2008-10-05 00:00:00||admin||set||status: open -> drafting|