Created on 2008-08-23.00:00:00 last changed 130 months ago
[Voted into WP at August, 2010 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (February, 2010):
Change the third bullet of the note in 13.10.3 [temp.deduct] paragraph 8 as follows:
[Note: Type deduction may fail for the following reasons:
...
Attempting to use a type that is not a class or enumeration type in a qualified name. [Example:...
...
The current rules in 13.10.3 [temp.deduct] say that type deduction fails as a result of attempting to use a type that is not a class type in a qualified name. However, it is now possible to use enumeration names as nested-name-specifiers, so this rule needs to be updated accordingly.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: fdis -> c++11 |
| 2011-04-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: wp -> fdis |
| 2010-11-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> wp |
| 2010-08-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2933 |
| 2010-08-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
| 2010-03-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: review -> ready |
| 2010-02-16 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2568 |
| 2010-02-16 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> review |
| 2008-10-05 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> drafting |
| 2008-08-23 00:00:00 | admin | create | |