Created on 2008-03-03.00:00:00 last changed 179 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the July, 2009 meeting as part of N2927.]
Proposed resolution (July, 2009)
See document PL22.16/09-0117 = WG21 N2927.
Notes from the June, 2008 meeting:
The only reference to “move constructor” in the core language clauses of the Standard is in 7.5.6 [expr.prim.lambda] paragraph 10; there are no semantic implications of the term. This issue will be addressed by using a function signature instead of the term, thus allowing the library section to provide a definition that is appropriate for its needs.
Although the term “move constructor” appears multiple times in the library clauses and is referenced in the newly-added text for the lambda feature, it is not defined anywhere.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-03-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: wp -> cd2 |
| 2009-11-08 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> wp |
| 2009-08-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2267 |
| 2009-08-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: review -> dr |
| 2009-03-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg1933 |
| 2009-03-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> review |
| 2008-06-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg1706 |
| 2008-06-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> drafting |
| 2008-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | create | |