Title
Address of static member function "&p->f"
Status
nad
Section
12.3 [over.over]
Submitter
Steve Adamczyk

Created on 1998-10-13.00:00:00 last changed 296 months ago

Messages

Date: 1999-10-15.00:00:00

Rationale (10/99): The "strict reading" correctly reflects the intent of the Committee, for the reason given, and no clarification is required.

Date: 2022-02-18.07:47:23

Can p->f, where f refers to a set of overloaded functions all of which are static member functions, be used as an expression in an address-of-overloaded-function context? A strict reading of this section suggests "no", because "p->f" is not the name of an overloaded function (it's an expression). I'm happy with that, but the core group should decide and should add an example to document the decision, whichever way it goes.

Rationale (10/99): The "strict reading" correctly reflects the intent of the Committee, for the reason given, and no clarification is required.

History
Date User Action Args
2000-02-23 00:00:00adminsetmessages: + msg289
2000-02-23 00:00:00adminsetstatus: open -> nad
1998-10-13 00:00:00admincreate