Created on 2006-04-21.00:00:00 last changed 179 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the March, 2009 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (September, 2008):
Change 9.2.4 [dcl.typedef] paragraph 1 as follows:
...The typedef specifiershall not be used in a function-definition (9.5 [dcl.fct.def]), and itshall not be combined in a decl-specifier-seq with any other kind of specifier except a type-specifier, and it shall be used neither in the decl-specifier-seq of a parameter-declaration (9.3.4.6 [dcl.fct]) nor in the decl-specifier-seq of a function-definition (9.5 [dcl.fct.def]).
Proposed resolution (March, 2008):
Change 9.2.4 [dcl.typedef] paragraph 1 as follows:
...The typedef specifiershall not be used in a function-definition (9.5 [dcl.fct.def]), and itshall not be combined in a decl-specifier-seq with any other kind of specifier except a type-specifier, and it shall not be used in the declaration of a function parameter nor in the decl-specifier-seq of a function-definition (9.5 [dcl.fct.def])...
9.2.4 [dcl.typedef] paragraph 1 says,
The typedef specifier shall not be used in a function-definition (9.5 [dcl.fct.def])...
Does this mean that the following is ill-formed?
void f() {
typedef int INT;
}
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-03-29 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: wp -> cd2 |
| 2009-08-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> wp |
| 2009-03-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg2023 |
| 2009-03-23 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
| 2008-10-05 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg1761 |
| 2008-10-05 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: review -> ready |
| 2008-05-18 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg1654 |
| 2008-05-18 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> review |
| 2006-11-05 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> drafting |
| 2006-04-21 00:00:00 | admin | create | |