Created on 2005-05-22.00:00:00 last changed 197 months ago
[Voted into WP at the October, 2006 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (April, 2006):
Change the last sentence of 6.7.6.5.2 [basic.stc.dynamic.allocation] paragraph 3 as indicated:
Any other allocation function that fails to allocate storage shallonlyindicate failure only by throwing an exception ofclass std::bad_alloc (17.6.4.1 [bad.alloc]) or a class derived from std::bad_alloca type that would match a handler (14.4 [except.handle]) of type std::bad_alloc (17.6.4.1 [bad.alloc]).
According to 6.7.6.5.2 [basic.stc.dynamic.allocation] paragraph 3,
Any other allocation function that fails to allocate storage shall only indicate failure by throwing an exception of class std::bad_alloc (17.6.4.1 [bad.alloc]) or a class derived from std::bad_alloc.
Shouldn't this statement have the usual requirements for an unambiguous and accessible base class?
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-10-05 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: wp -> cd1 |
| 2007-05-06 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> wp |
| 2006-11-05 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg1430 |
| 2006-11-05 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
| 2006-04-22 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: review -> ready |
| 2005-10-22 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg1230 |
| 2005-10-22 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> review |
| 2005-05-22 00:00:00 | admin | create | |