Created on 2004-10-21.00:00:00 last changed 130 months ago
[Voted into the WP at the February, 2012 meeting; moved to DR at the October, 2012 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (August, 2011):
Change 6.8.2 [basic.fundamental] paragraph 3 as follows:
...collectively called the extended integer types. The signed and unsigned integral types shall satisfy the constraints given in ISO C 5.2.4.2.1.
There is no normative requirement on the ranges of the integral types, although the footnote in 6.8.2 [basic.fundamental] paragraph 2 indicates the intent (for int, at least) that they match the values given in the <climits> header. Should there be an explicit requirement of some sort?
(See also paper N1693.)
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drwp -> cd3 |
| 2012-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> drwp |
| 2012-02-27 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3790 |
| 2012-02-27 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
| 2011-09-06 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg3427 |
| 2011-09-06 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> ready |
| 2004-10-21 00:00:00 | admin | create | |