Created on 2002-05-26.00:00:00 last changed 197 months ago
[Voted into WP at April, 2007 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (October, 2006):
Replace Clause 3 [intro.defs] “signature” with the following:
the name and the parameter-type-list (9.3.4.6 [dcl.fct]) of a function, as well as the class or namespace of which it is a member. If a function or function template is a class member its signature additionally includes the cv-qualifiers (if any) on the function or function template itself. The signature of a function template additionally includes its return type and its template parameter list. The signature of a function template specialization includes the signature of the template of which it is a specialization and its template arguments (whether explicitly specified or deduced). [Note: Signatures are used as a basis for name-mangling and linking. —end note]
Delete paragraph 3 and replace the first sentence of 13.7.7.2 [temp.over.link] as follows:
The signature of a function template specialization consists of the signature of the function template and of the actual template arguments (whether explicitly specified or deduced).The signature of a function template
consists of its function signature, its return type and its template parameter listis defined in Clause 3 [intro.defs]. The names of the template parameters are significant...
(See also issue 537.)
Section Clause 3 [intro.defs], definition of "signature" omits the function name as part of the signature. Since the name participates in overload resolution, shouldn't it be included in the definition? I didn't find a definition of signature in the ARM, but I might have missed it.
Fergus Henderson: I think so. In particular, _N4140_.17.6.4.3.2 [global.names] reserves certain "function signatures" for use by the implementation, which would be wrong unless the signature includes the name.
-2- Each global function signature declared with external linkage in a header is reserved to the implementation to designate that function signature with external linkage.
-5- Each function signature from the Standard C library declared with external linkage is reserved to the implementation for use as a function signature with both extern "C" and extern "C++" linkage, or as a name of namespace scope in the global namespace.
Other uses of the term "function signature" in the description of the standard library also seem to assume that it includes the name.
James Widman:
Names don't participate in overload resolution; name lookup is separate from overload resolution. However, the word “signature” is not used in Clause 12 [over]. It is used in linkage and declaration matching (e.g., 13.7.7.2 [temp.over.link]). This suggests that the name and scope of the function should be part of its signature.
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2008-10-05 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: wp -> cd1 |
2007-08-05 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> wp |
2007-05-06 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg1497 |
2007-05-06 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
2006-11-05 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: review -> ready |
2006-09-09 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg1390 |
2006-09-09 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> review |
2002-05-26 00:00:00 | admin | create |