Created on 2002-04-23.00:00:00 last changed 36 months ago
Proposed resolution (March, 2017):
This issue is resolved by the resolution of issue 1710.
Additional note (January, 2014):
See also issue 1710.
[Adopted at the February/March, 2017 meeting.]
By analogy with typename, the keyword template used to indicate that a dependent name will be a template name should be optional in contexts where a type is required, e.g., base class lists. We could also consider member and parameter declarations.
This was suggested by issue 314.
|2018-02-27 00:00:00||admin||set||status: drafting -> c++17|
|2017-02-06 00:00:00||admin||set||status: review -> drafting|
|2014-11-24 00:00:00||admin||set||status: ready -> review|
|2014-03-03 00:00:00||admin||set||messages: + msg4844|
|2014-03-03 00:00:00||admin||set||status: open -> ready|
|2014-01-20 00:00:00||admin||set||messages: + msg4781|