- Title
- Remove redundancy "names or designates"
- Status
- ready
- Section
- 13.3 [temp.names]
- Submitter
- US
Created on 2025-10-01.00:00:00 last changed 1 month ago
Messages
Date: 2025-10-24.19:41:57
Proposed resolution (approved by CWG 2025-10-24):
Change in 13.3 [temp.names] paragraph 8 as follows:
... A simple-template-id or splice-specialization-specifier shall be valid unless its respective template-name or splice-specifiernames ordesignates a function template (13.10.3 [temp.deduct]). ...
Date: 2025-10-24.19:41:57
N5028 comment
US 50-091
There is expression redundancy (and possible ambiguity) with the phrasing "names or designates" in 13.3 [temp.names] paragraph 8.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2025-11-06 23:04:52 | admin | set | status: tentatively ready -> ready |
| 2025-10-24 19:41:57 | admin | set | messages: + msg8172 |
| 2025-10-24 19:41:57 | admin | set | status: open -> tentatively ready |
| 2025-10-01 00:00:00 | admin | create | |