Proposed resolution (approved by CWG 2024-11-19):

1. Change in 13.8.3.4 [temp.dep.constexpr] paragraph 2 as follows:

   Expressions of the following form are value-dependent if the unary-expression or expression is type-dependent or the type-id is dependent:

   sizeof unary-expression
   sizeof ( type-id )
   typeid ( expression )
   typeid ( type-id )
   alignof ( type-id )
   noexcept ( expression )
   

2. Change in 13.8.3.4 [temp.dep.constexpr] paragraph 3 as follows:

   Expressions of the following form are value-dependent if either the type-id or , simple-type-specifier, or typename-specifier is dependent or the expression or cast-expression is value-dependent or any expression in the expression-list is value-dependent or any assignment-expression in the braced-init-list is value-dependent:

   simple-type-specifier ( expression-listopt )
   typename-specifier ( expression-listopt )
   simple-type-specifier braced-init-list
   typename-specifier braced-init-list
   static_cast < type-id > ( expression )
   const_cast < type-id > ( expression )
   reinterpret_cast < type-id > ( expression )
   dynamic_cast < type-id > ( expression )
   ( type-id ) cast-expression
   

3. Add a new paragraph before 13.8.3.4 [temp.dep.constexpr] paragraph 5 as follows:

   A noexcept-expression (7.6.2.7 [expr.unary.noexcept]) is value-dependent if its expression involves a template parameter.

   An expression of the form &qualified-id where ...

(From submission #554.)

The following examples of noexcept-expressions are not specified to be value-dependent, but ought to be, because value-initialization of T might throw an exception.

  template<typename T>
  void f() {
    noexcept(static_cast<int>(T{}));
    noexcept(typeid(*T{}));
    noexcept(delete T{});
  }