Created on 1998-03-19.00:00:00 last changed 196 months ago
[Moved to DR at October 2002 meeting. This was incorrectly marked as having DR status between 4/01 and 4/02. It was overlooked when issue 4 was moved to DR at the 4/01 meeting; this one should have been moved as well, because it's resolved by the changes there.]
Proposed Resolution (04/01):
See the proposed resolution for Core issue 4, which covers this case.
The ODR should also be checked to see whether it addresses name and type linkage.
Consider the following:
extern "C" void foo() { extern void bar(); bar(); }Does "bar()" have "C" language linkage?
The ARM is explicit and says
A linkage-specification for a function also applies to functions and objects declared within it.The DIS says
In a linkage-specification, the specified language linkage applies to the function types of all function declarators, function names, and variable names introduced by the declaration(s).Is the body of a function definition part of the declaration?
From Mike Miller:
Yes: from 9.1 [dcl.pre] paragraph 1,
From Dag Brück:
Consider the following where extern "C" has been moved to a separate declaration:
extern "C" void foo(); void foo() { extern void bar(); bar(); }I think the ARM wording could possibly be interpreted such that bar() has "C" linkage in my example, but not the DIS wording.
As a side note, I have always wanted to think that placing extern "C" on a function definition or a separate declaration would produce identical programs.
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2008-10-05 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: wp -> cd1 |
2003-04-25 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> wp |
2002-11-08 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg772 |
2002-11-08 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
2002-05-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> ready |
2001-05-20 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg517 |
2001-05-20 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> dr |
1998-03-19 00:00:00 | admin | create |