CWG 2023-02-07

P1787R6 clarified that the example added to 9.9 [namespace.udecl] paragraph 10 is accepted, even in the non-function case.

CWG 2023-01-06

There is implementation divergence in handling this example.

Proposed resolution (approved by CWG 2023-06-13):

1. Add an example to 9.9 [namespace.udecl] paragraph 8 as follows:

   [ Example:

   struct C {
     int i;
   };
   
   struct D1 : C { };
   struct D2 : C { };
   
   struct D3 : D1, D2 {
     using D1::i;   // OK, equivalent to using C::i
     using D1::i;   // error: duplicate
     using D2::i;   // error: duplicate, also names C::i
   };
   

   -- end example ]

2. Change the example in 9.9 [namespace.udecl] paragraph 10 as follows:

     using B::x;
     using A::x;              // OK, hides struct B::x
     using A::x;              // OK, does not conflict with previous using A::x
     x = 99;                  // assigns to A::x
     struct x x1;             // x1 has class type B::x
   }
   

[Accepted as a DR at the June, 2023 meeting.]

Issue 36 was resolved by P1787R6, but no example was added.