Created on 2022-11-03.00:00:00 last changed 17 months ago
Proposed resolution (approved by CWG 2022-11-08):
Change in 12.4.4 [over.call] paragraph 1 as follows:
If a surrogate call functionfor a conversion function named operator conversion-type-idis selected, let e be the result of invoking the corresponding conversion operator function on the postfix-expression;is invokedthe expression is interpreted asOtherwise, ...postfix-expression . operator conversion-type-id ()e ( expression-listopt )
[Accepted as a DR at the November, 2022 meeting.]
Post-Prague "editorial" change cplusplus/draft#3625 removed the normative text supporting the interpretation that surrogate call functions, when chosen, call the functions they were formed from.
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2023-07-16 13:00:43 | admin | set | status: open -> c++23 |
2023-07-16 13:00:43 | admin | set | status: drwp -> open |
2023-02-18 18:43:04 | admin | set | status: dr -> drwp |
2022-11-25 05:14:04 | admin | set | status: nb -> dr |
2022-11-08 20:21:10 | admin | set | status: open -> nb |
2022-11-08 20:21:10 | admin | set | status: open -> open |
2022-11-08 20:21:10 | admin | set | status: open -> open |
2022-11-08 20:21:10 | admin | set | status: open -> open |
2022-11-08 20:21:10 | admin | set | messages: + msg6986 |
2022-11-08 13:26:04 | admin | set | status: nb -> open |
2022-11-08 13:26:04 | admin | set | status: nb -> nb |
2022-11-08 13:26:04 | admin | set | status: nb -> nb |
2022-11-03 00:00:00 | admin | create |