Created on 2022-09-07.00:00:00 last changed 5 months ago
CWG 2024-06-14
The proposed resolution does not work, because utterances such as "a default constructor is implicitly declared if no constructor is user-declared" become circular. The eventual definition should address the question whether constructors inherited from a base class are considered user-declared in the inheriting class.
Proposed resolution:
Add a new entry after 3.64 [defns.unspecified] as follows:
user-declared [defns.user.declared]
not implicitly declared
The term "user-declared" is used 30 times throughout the standard, but it is not defined.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2024-06-14 20:31:51 | admin | set | messages: + msg7735 |
| 2024-06-14 20:31:51 | admin | set | status: review -> drafting |
| 2023-11-16 21:27:26 | admin | set | messages: + msg7515 |
| 2023-11-16 21:27:26 | admin | set | status: open -> review |
| 2022-09-07 00:00:00 | admin | create | |