Proposed resolution (approved by CWG 2022-11-09):

Change in 11.2 [class.prop] paragraph 9 as follows:

A class S is an implicit-lifetime class if

• it is an aggregate whose destructor is not user-provided or
• it has at least one trivial eligible constructor and a trivial, non-deleted destructor.

CWG 2022-11-09:

A deleted destructor does not prevent an aggregate from being an implicit-lifetime class.

Additional notes (September, 2022):

From a thread starting here: What if X had a deleted destructor (either explicitly or implicitly)?

[Accepted as a DR at the November, 2022 meeting.]

Subclause 11.2 [class.prop] paragraph 9 specifies:

A class S is an implicit-lifetime class if

• it is an aggregate or
• it has at least one trivial eligible constructor and a trivial, non-deleted destructor.

However, an aggregate may have a non-deleted non-trivial destructor:

  struct X {
    Y i;
    ~X();
  };

This class is an aggregate, but destroying X itself (ignoring the subobjects) does not satisfy "destroying an instance of the type runs no code"; see P0593R6 "Implicit creation of objects for low-level object manipulation" section 3.1.