Created on 1997-09-22.00:00:00 last changed 323 months ago
The working paper is quite explicit about
struct X {
X(X, X const& = X());
};
being illegal (because of the chicken & egg problem wrt copying.)
Shouldn't it be as explicit about the following?
struct Y {
Y(Y const&, Y = Y());
};
Rationale:
There is no need for additional wording. This example leads to
a program which either fails to compile (due to resource limits on recursive
inlining) or fails to run (due to unterminated recursion). In either case
the implementation may generate an error when the program is compiled.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 1997-09-22 00:00:00 | admin | create | |