Created on 2019-06-10.00:00:00 last changed 17 months ago
Additional notes (February, 2023)
After adopting paper P2280, it is no longer accurate that any use of requirement parameters makes an expression non-constant. However, the resolution as adopted makes the treatment of examples like the following uniform in requirements and other constant expression contexts:
template<typename ArrayType> concept LargeArray = requires (ArrayType my_array) { requires my_array.size() > 5; }
Proposed resolution (approved by CWG 2023-01-06):
Remove 7.5.8.5 [expr.prim.req.nested] paragraph 2, including its example:
A local parameter shall only appear as an unevaluated operand (7.2.3 [expr.context]) within the constraint-expression. [Example 2:template<typename T> concept C = requires (T a) { requires sizeof(a) == 4; // OK requires a == 0; // error: evaluation of a constraint variable };
[Accepted as a DR at the February, 2023 meeting.]
According to 7.5.8.5 [expr.prim.req.nested] paragraph 2,
A local parameter shall only appear as an unevaluated operand (7.2.3 [expr.context]) within the constraint-expression. [Example 2:
template<typename T> concept C = requires (T a) { requires sizeof(a) == 4; // OK requires a == 0; // error: evaluation of a constraint variable };—end example]
However, a can't be used in a constant expression in any event, so the restriction is meaningless, except for ruling out an expression like true ? true : a, but there seems no reason to have a special rule for such a case.
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2023-07-16 13:00:43 | admin | set | status: open -> c++23 |
2023-07-16 13:00:43 | admin | set | status: dr -> open |
2023-02-23 22:06:50 | admin | set | messages: + msg7208 |
2023-02-18 18:43:04 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
2023-02-07 14:43:26 | admin | set | status: tentatively ready -> ready |
2023-01-07 14:32:23 | admin | set | status: open -> tentatively ready |
2022-02-18 07:47:23 | admin | set | messages: + msg6726 |
2019-06-10 00:00:00 | admin | create |