Created on 2000-07-28.00:00:00 last changed 196 months ago
[Voted into WP at October 2005 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (October, 2004):
Fixed by the resolution of issue 470.
In 13.9.3 [temp.explicit] paragraph 7 we read:
The explicit instantiation of a class template specialization implies the instantiation of all of its members not previously explicitly specialized in the translation unit containing the explicit instantiation.
Is "member" intended to mean "non-inherited member?" If yes, maybe it should be clarified since 11.7 [class.derived] paragraph 1 says,
Unless redefined in the derived class, members of a base class are also considered to be members of the derived class.
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2008-10-05 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: wp -> cd1 |
2006-04-22 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> wp |
2005-10-22 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg1287 |
2005-10-22 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: review -> dr |
2004-11-07 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg1071 |
2004-11-07 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> review |
2000-07-28 00:00:00 | admin | create |