Created on 2015-11-02.00:00:00 last changed 83 months ago
Rationale (November, 2016):
CWG felt that the current specification is sufficiently clear and there was no consensus for a change.
Is numeric_limits<int>::radix required to be 2? 17.3.5.2 [numeric.limits.members] paragraph 23 specifies:
static constexpr int radix;
For integer types, specifies the base of the representation.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2018-02-27 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg6023 |
| 2018-02-27 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> nad |
| 2015-11-02 00:00:00 | admin | create | |