Created on 2015-07-24.00:00:00 last changed 95 months ago
Proposed resolution (January, 2016):
Add the following as an additional bullet following 9.2.6 [dcl.constexpr] bullet 3.5.2:
The definition of a constexpr function shall satisfy the following requirements:
...
its function-body shall be = delete, = default, or a compound-statement that does not contain
an asm-definition,
a goto statement,
an identifier label (8.2 [stmt.label]),
...
[Adopted at the February, 2016 meeting.]
The requirements for constexpr functions do not, but presumably should, forbid the appearance of a label in the function body (gotos are prohibited).
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-02-06 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: tentatively ready -> cd4 |
| 2016-02-15 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg5702 |
| 2016-02-15 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> tentatively ready |
| 2015-07-24 00:00:00 | admin | create | |