Created on 2015-06-13.00:00:00 last changed 109 months ago
Rationale (October, 2015):
CWG felt that the current usage is plain English, not a technical term, and is clear enough.
One would expect to find a definition of the terms “associated class” and “associated namespace” in 6.5.4 [basic.lookup.argdep], but there is none. Note also that “associated class” is used in a different sense in 7.6.10 [expr.eq] bullet 3.6, and that drafting being proposed for other issues also uses the term differently.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015-11-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg5974 |
| 2015-06-13 00:00:00 | admin | create | |