Created on 2015-03-15.00:00:00 last changed 95 months ago
Proposed resolution (October, 2015):
Change 9.3.4.5 [dcl.array] paragraph 3 as follows:
...An array bound may also be omitted when the declarator is followed by an initializer (9.4 [dcl.init]) or when a declarator for a static data member is followed by a brace-or-equal-initializer (11.4 [class.mem]). Inthis caseboth cases the bound is calculated from the number of initial elements...
[Adopted at the February, 2016 meeting.]
According to 9.3.4.5 [dcl.array] paragraph 3,
An array bound may also be omitted when the declarator is followed by an initializer (9.4 [dcl.init]). In this case the bound is calculated from the number of initial elements...
However, the grammar for member-declarator uses brace-or-equal-initializer, not initializer, so the following is ill-formed:
struct X { static constexpr int arr[] = { 1, 2, 3 }; };
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2017-02-06 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> cd4 |
2015-11-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg5578 |
2015-11-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> ready |
2015-03-15 00:00:00 | admin | create |