Title
Use of template<> defining member of explicit specialization
Status
drafting
Section
13.9.4 [temp.expl.spec]
Submitter
Richard Smith

Created on 2014-08-31.00:00:00 last changed 95 months ago

Messages

Date: 2014-08-31.00:00:00

Issue 531 surveyed existing practice at the time and determined that the most common syntax for defining a member of an explicit specialization used the template<> prefix. This approach, however, does not seem consistent, since such a definition is not itself an explicit specialization.

History
Date User Action Args
2017-02-06 00:00:00adminsetstatus: open -> drafting
2014-08-31 00:00:00admincreate