Created on 2014-07-08.00:00:00 last changed 95 months ago
[Moved to DR at the May, 2015 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (April, 2015):
Change 9.7.1 [dcl.enum] paragraph 1 as follows:
A : following “enum identifier” within the decl-specifier-seq of a member-declaration is parsed as part of an enum-base. [Note: This resolves a potential ambiguity between the declaration of an enumeration with an enum-base and the declaration of an unnamed bit-field of enumeration type...
The resolution of issue 1514 was intended to apply whenever enum identifier appears; however, the fact that the disambiguation rule appears in the description of the enum-specifier makes it unclear that it is intended to apply in other contexts such as:
enum E { e1 }; void f() { false ? new enum E : int(); }
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2017-02-06 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drwp -> cd4 |
2015-11-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> drwp |
2015-05-25 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg6052 |
2015-05-25 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: tentatively ready -> dr |
2015-04-13 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg5314 |
2015-04-13 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> tentatively ready |
2014-07-08 00:00:00 | admin | create |