Created on 2014-07-07.00:00:00 last changed 114 months ago
Rationale (November, 2014):
A type-id is intended as a reference to a type, but the opaque enumeration syntax is intended as a declaration, not a reference like an elaborated-type-specifier, so the current rules are as intended.
The grammar does not allow for a declaration of the form
using T = enum class E : int;
However, it is widely accepted by current implementations. Should the rules be changed to accommodate this usage?
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-11-24 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg5276 |
| 2014-07-07 00:00:00 | admin | create | |