Created on 2014-06-09.00:00:00 last changed 48 months ago
Proposed resolution (January, 2019):
Change 16.4.2.5 [compliance] paragraph 1 as follows:
Two kinds of implementations are defined: hosted and freestanding (4.1 [intro.compliance]) the kind of the implementation is implementation-defined. For a hosted implementation, this document describes the set of available headers.
[Accepted as a DR at the February, 2019 meeting.]
Whether an implementation is hosted or freestanding is only required to be documented by the value of the __STDC_HOSTED__ macro (15.11 [cpp.predefined]). Should this characteristic be classified as implementation-defined, thus requiring documentation?
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2020-12-15 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg6345 |
| 2020-12-15 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> cd5 |
| 2014-06-09 00:00:00 | admin | create | |