Created on 2014-03-18.00:00:00 last changed 20 months ago
Notes from the November, 2014 meeting:
CWG agreed that the usage should be permitted, provided that the dependent types are equivalent. Note that this is a weaker requirement than the token-for-token identity of the ODR, since alias templates are not definitions per Clause 13 [temp] paragraph 1.
[Accepted at the November, 2020 meeting as part of paper P1787R6 and moved to DR at the February, 2021 meeting.]
The current wording of the Standard does not permit repeated alias template declarations within a scope, but some current implementations allow it, presumably by analogy with typedef declarations. Should the Standard be changed to permit this usage?
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-08-19 07:54:33 | admin | set | status: drwp -> cd6 |
| 2021-02-24 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: accepted -> drwp |
| 2020-12-15 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> accepted |
| 2014-11-24 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg5224 |
| 2014-11-24 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> drafting |
| 2014-03-18 00:00:00 | admin | create | |