Title
Language linkage for main()
Status
cd4
Section
6.9.3.1 [basic.start.main]
Submitter
Richard Smith

Created on 2014-03-04.00:00:00 last changed 49 months ago

Messages

Date: 2015-05-15.00:00:00

[Moved to DR at the May, 2015 meeting.]

Date: 2014-11-15.00:00:00

Proposed resolution (November, 2014):

  1. Change 6.9.3.1 [basic.start.main] paragraph 2 as follows:

  2. An implementation shall not predefine the main function. This function shall not be overloaded. It Its type shall have C++ language linkage and it shall have a declared return type of type int, but otherwise its type is implementation-defined. An implementation shall allow both...
  3. Change 6.9.3.1 [basic.start.main] paragraph 3 as follows:

  4. The function main shall not be used within a program. The linkage (6.6 [basic.link]) of main is implementation-defined. A program that defines main as deleted or that declares main to be inline, static, or constexpr is ill-formed. The main function shall not be declared with a linkage-specification (9.11 [dcl.link]). A program that declares a variable main at global scope or that declares the name main with C language linkage (in any namespace) is ill-formed. The name main is not otherwise reserved...
Date: 2014-03-04.00:00:00

There does not appear to be any restriction on giving main() an explicit language linkage, but it should probably be either ill-formed or conditionally-supported.

History
Date User Action Args
2017-02-06 00:00:00adminsetstatus: drwp -> cd4
2015-11-10 00:00:00adminsetstatus: dr -> drwp
2015-05-25 00:00:00adminsetmessages: + msg6040
2015-05-25 00:00:00adminsetstatus: tentatively ready -> dr
2014-11-24 00:00:00adminsetmessages: + msg5157
2014-11-24 00:00:00adminsetstatus: drafting -> tentatively ready
2014-07-07 00:00:00adminsetstatus: open -> drafting
2014-03-04 00:00:00admincreate