Created on 2014-02-25.00:00:00 last changed 95 months ago
[Moved to DR at the November, 2014 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (June, 2014):
This issue is resolved by the resolution of issue 1813.
According to 11.4.10 [class.bit] paragraph 2,
Unnamed bit-fields are not members and cannot be initialized.
However, the rules defining standard-layout classes in Clause 11 [class] paragraph 7 do not account for the fact that a class containing an unnamed bit-field has associated storage.
See also issue 1813 for a related question about standard-layout classes.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-02-06 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drwp -> cd4 |
| 2015-05-25 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> drwp |
| 2015-04-13 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg5389 |
| 2014-11-24 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: tentatively ready -> dr |
| 2014-07-07 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg5079 |
| 2014-07-07 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> tentatively ready |
| 2014-02-25 00:00:00 | admin | create | |