Created on 2014-01-30.00:00:00 last changed 95 months ago
[Moved to DR at the November, 2014 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (February, 2014):
Change 9.5.2 [dcl.fct.def.default] paragraph 2 as follows:
An explicitly-defaulted function that is not defined as deleted may be declared constexpr only if it would have been implicitly declared as constexpr.
According to 9.5.2 [dcl.fct.def.default] paragraph 2,
An explicitly-defaulted function may be declared constexpr only if it would have been implicitly declared as constexpr.
However, the rules for determining whether a function is constexpr and its exception-specification depend on the definition of function and do not apply to deleted functions. Can an explicitly-defaulted implicitly-deleted function be declared constexpr or have an exception-specification, and if so, how is its correctness to be determined?
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-02-06 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drwp -> cd4 |
| 2015-05-25 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> drwp |
| 2015-04-13 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg5379 |
| 2014-11-24 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
| 2014-07-07 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg5069 |
| 2014-07-07 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: review -> ready |
| 2014-01-30 00:00:00 | admin | create | |