Created on 2013-09-26.00:00:00 last changed 87 months ago
[Moved to DR at the November, 2014 meeting.]
Proposed resolution (February, 2014):
Add the following as a new paragraph following 7.5.5 [expr.prim.lambda] paragraph 21:
The closure type associated with a lambda-expression has an implicitly-declared destructor (11.4.7 [class.dtor]).
A member of a closure type shall not be explicitly instantiated (13.9.2 [temp.inst]), explicitly specialized (13.9.3 [temp.explicit]), or named in a friend declaration (11.8.4 [class.friend]).
Similarly to issue 1738, it is not clear whether it is permitted to explicitly instantiate or specialize the call operator of a polymorphic lambda (via decltype).
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2017-02-06 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drwp -> cd4 |
| 2015-05-25 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> drwp |
| 2015-04-13 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg5338 |
| 2014-11-24 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> dr |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg4806 |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> ready |
| 2013-09-26 00:00:00 | admin | create | |