Title
Return type and value for operator= with ref-qualifier
Status
cd6
Section
9.5.2 [dcl.fct.def.default]
Submitter
James Widman

Created on 2013-08-09.00:00:00 last changed 20 months ago

Messages

Date: 2021-08-15.00:00:00

Proposed resolution (August, 2021):

  1. Change 11.4.6 [class.copy.assign] paragraph 6 as follows:

  2. The implicitly-declared copy/move assignment operator for class X has the return type X&; it returns the object for which the assignment operator is invoked, that is, the object assigned to. An implicitly-declared copy/move assignment operator is an inline public member of its class.
  3. Add the following as a new paragraph following 11.4.6 [class.copy.assign] paragraph 13:

  4. The implicitly-defined copy assignment operator for a union X copies the object representation (6.8 [basic.types]) of X. If the source and destination of the assignment are not the same object, then for each object nested within (6.7.2 [intro.object]) the object that is the source of the copy, a corresponding object o nested within the destination is created, and the lifetime of o begins before the copy is performed.

    The implicitly-defined copy/move assignment operator for a class returns the object for which the assignment operator is invoked, that is, the object assigned to.

[Note: The first point in the issue, that of the relationship between the ref-qualifier and the return type, will be referred to EWG for consideration. The draft resolution above addresses only the second point of the issue.

Date: 2021-10-15.00:00:00

[Accepted as a DR at the October, 2021 meeting.]

9.5.2 [dcl.fct.def.default] paragraph 1 specifies that an explicitly-defaulted function shall

have the same declared function type (except for possibly differing ref-qualifiers and except that in the case of a copy constructor or copy assignment operator, the parameter type may be “reference to non-const T”, where T is the name of the member function's class) as if it had been implicitly declared...

This allows an example like

  struct A {
    A& operator=(A const&) && = default;
  };

but forbids

  struct B {
    B&& operator=(B const&) && = default;
  };

which seems backward.

In addition, 11.4.5.3 [class.copy.ctor] paragraph 22 only specifies the return value for implicitly-declared copy/move assignment operators, not for explicitly-defaulted ones.

History
Date User Action Args
2022-08-19 07:54:33adminsetstatus: drwp -> cd6
2022-02-15 00:00:00adminsetstatus: dr -> drwp
2021-11-15 00:00:00adminsetmessages: + msg6574
2021-11-15 00:00:00adminsetstatus: drafting -> dr
2013-10-14 00:00:00adminsetstatus: open -> drafting
2013-08-09 00:00:00admincreate