- Title
- template in elaborated-type-specifier without nested-name-specifier
- Status
- c++14
- Section
- 9.2.9.5 [dcl.type.elab]
- Submitter
- Richard Smith
Created on 2013-06-27.00:00:00 last changed 133 months ago
Messages
Date: 2014-02-15.00:00:00
[Moved to DR at the February, 2014 meeting.]
Date: 2014-01-15.00:00:00
Proposed resolution (January, 2014):
Change the grammar in 9.2.9.5 [dcl.type.elab] as follows:
-
elaborated-type-specifier:
-
class-key attribute-specifier-seqopt nested-name-specifieropt identifier
class-key simple-template-id
class-key nested-name-specifier
enum nested-name-specifieropt identifier
Date: 2013-06-27.00:00:00
The grammar for elaborated-type-specifier in 9.2.9.5 [dcl.type.elab] reads, in part,
-
elaborated-type-specifier:
-
class-key nested-name-specifieropt templateopt simple-template-id
This allows use of the template keyword without a nested-name-specifier, e.g., struct template S<int>. This is inconsistent with other uses of the template keyword. It might be better to split the production in two and only allow the keyword following a nested-name-specifier, i.e.,
-
elaborated-type-specifier:
-
class-key simple-template-id
class-key nested-name-specifier templateopt simple-template-id
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-11-24 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: dr -> c++14 |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg4947 |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: tentatively ready -> dr |
| 2014-01-20 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg4727 |
| 2014-01-20 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: drafting -> tentatively ready |
| 2013-10-14 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> drafting |
| 2013-06-27 00:00:00 | admin | create | |