[Moved to DR at the February, 2014 meeting.]

Proposed resolution (November, 2013):

1. Change the grammar in 11.4 [class.mem] as follows:

member-declaration:
attribute-specifier-seq_opt decl-specifier-seq_opt member-declarator-list_opt ;
function-definition ;_opt
using-declaration
static_assert-declaration
template-declaration
alias-declaration
empty-declaration

2. Change 11.4 [class.mem] paragraph 1 as follows:

...Except when used to declare friends (11.8.4 [class.friend]) or to introduce the name of a member of a base class into a derived class (9.9 [namespace.udecl]), or when the declaration is an empty-declaration, member-declarations declare members of the class, and each such member-declaration shall declare at least one member name of the class.

The grammar in 11.4 [class.mem] and 9.5.1 [dcl.fct.def.general] paragraph 1 are (in part):

member-declaration:
function-definition ;_opt

function-definition:
function-body

function-body:
= default ;
= delete ;

This leads to the following curiosity:

  struct A {
    void f1() = delete;   // #1, ok
    void f2() = delete;;  // #2, ok
    void f3() = delete;;; // #3, error, extraneous semicolon
  };

This could be addressed by moving the semicolon into the productions for function-body for the non-default/delete forms or by adding empty-declaration to the list of member-declaration productions, as is done with namespace-scope declarations.