Created on 2013-05-14.00:00:00 last changed 122 months ago
Proposed resolution (September, 2013):
This issue is resolved by the resolution of issue 1760.
[Applied to WP at the February, 2014 meeting.]
According to 7.5.6 [expr.prim.lambda] paragraph 10,
The identifier in a simple-capture is looked up using the usual rules for unqualified name lookup (6.5.3 [basic.lookup.unqual]); each such lookup shall find a variable with automatic storage duration declared in the reaching scope of the local lambda expression.
This does not permit a nested lambda to capture the non-static data member of the closure type introduced by an init-capture. A similar restriction applies to implicit capture in paragraph 12.
Presumably such captures should be allowed, capturing the non-static data member directly rather than the this pointer from the enclosing lambda's operator().
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-11-24 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: accepted -> c++14 |
| 2014-03-03 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: ready -> accepted |
| 2013-10-14 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg4577 |
| 2013-10-14 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> ready |
| 2013-05-14 00:00:00 | admin | create | |