Created on 2013-04-15.00:00:00 last changed 109 months ago
Rationale (October, 2015)
SG1 reaffirms the original intent of this specification.
According to 6.9.2 [intro.multithread] paragraph 24,
The implementation may assume that any thread will eventually do one of the following:
terminate,
make a call to a library I/O function,
access or modify a volatile object, or
perform a synchronization operation or an atomic operation.
[Note: This is intended to allow compiler transformations such as removal of empty loops, even when termination cannot be proven. —end note]
Some programmers find this liberty afforded to implementations to be disadvantageous; see this blog post for a discussion of the subject.
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2015-11-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg5968 |
2015-11-10 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: concurrency -> nad |
2013-10-14 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> concurrency |
2013-04-15 00:00:00 | admin | create |