- Title
- Literal types and constexpr defaulted constructors
- Status
- dup
- Section
- 6.9 [basic.types]
- Submitter
- Richard Smith
Created on 2013-04-20.00:00:00 last changed 148 months ago
Messages
Date: 2013-09-15.00:00:00
Rationale (September, 2013):
This issue duplicates issue 1360.
Date: 2022-11-20.07:54:16
The requirement in 6.9 [basic.types] that a literal type must have a constexpr constructor has caused signficant problems with respect to defaulted default constructors, since the determination of whether a constructor is constexpr depends on its definition and a defaulted special member function is only defined if it is odr-used. It might be better to remove that requirement, at least as it applies to defaulted default constructors.
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-10-14 00:00:00 | admin | set | messages: + msg4717 |
| 2013-10-14 00:00:00 | admin | set | status: open -> dup |
| 2013-04-20 00:00:00 | admin | create | |